<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Learning, theory, philosophy, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:23:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Francine!  These are excellent references.  I&#039;m glad to see that there are many others who are concerned about the issues of breadth vs. depth.  I know someone who often says that the web has a tendency to make us all exhibit ADD behaviors.  There may be some truth to that, and it&#039;s a humbling thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Francine!  These are excellent references.  I&#8217;m glad to see that there are many others who are concerned about the issues of breadth vs. depth.  I know someone who often says that the web has a tendency to make us all exhibit ADD behaviors.  There may be some truth to that, and it&#8217;s a humbling thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine</title>
		<link>http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forestfortrees.edublogs.org/2005/10/31/deep-thoughts/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>i thought you might enjoy the following counter arguments to &#039;shallow thinking&quot; . These posts are about the &lt;i&gt;crisis of attention&lt;/i&gt; and the principle that less is more.

From Om Malik&#039;s blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2005/11/01/the-economics-of-attention-crisis/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The economics and attention crisis&lt;/a&gt;

From Fred Wilson &lt;a href=&quot;http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/11/the_looming_att.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The looming attention crisis&lt;/a&gt;

From Jeff Nolan &lt;a href=&quot;http://sapventures.typepad.com/main/2005/11/the_looming_att.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The looming attention crisis&lt;/a&gt; 

From Jamie Pitt &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.semanticwave.com/blog/archives/000203.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The attention economy&lt;/a&gt;

From Business Week &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2005/11/pay_attention.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_blogspotting&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pay attention&lt;/a&gt;

From HackingCough &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackingcough.com/blog/archives/2005/11/the_attention_d.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The attention deficit pulls the mainstream nearer&lt;/a&gt;

this last post reflects on our biased attention when reading blogs. This is  something George Siemens has taken up in the past: the problem of reading only what echoes back our own thinking. A valid point for sure.

Meanwhile I thought these links provided a nice counter-argument to pro ramping up for more argument, even if they all seem to be talking to each other B-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought you might enjoy the following counter arguments to &#8217;shallow thinking&#8221; . These posts are about the <i>crisis of attention</i> and the principle that less is more.</p>
<p>From Om Malik&#8217;s blog: <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/01/the-economics-of-attention-crisis/" rel="nofollow">The economics and attention crisis</a></p>
<p>From Fred Wilson <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/11/the_looming_att.html" rel="nofollow">The looming attention crisis</a></p>
<p>From Jeff Nolan <a href="http://sapventures.typepad.com/main/2005/11/the_looming_att.html" rel="nofollow">The looming attention crisis</a> </p>
<p>From Jamie Pitt <a href="http://www.semanticwave.com/blog/archives/000203.jsp" rel="nofollow">The attention economy</a></p>
<p>From Business Week <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2005/11/pay_attention.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_blogspotting" rel="nofollow">Pay attention</a></p>
<p>From HackingCough <a href="http://www.hackingcough.com/blog/archives/2005/11/the_attention_d.htm" rel="nofollow">The attention deficit pulls the mainstream nearer</a></p>
<p>this last post reflects on our biased attention when reading blogs. This is  something George Siemens has taken up in the past: the problem of reading only what echoes back our own thinking. A valid point for sure.</p>
<p>Meanwhile I thought these links provided a nice counter-argument to pro ramping up for more argument, even if they all seem to be talking to each other B-))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
